Skip to main content
patrickWeb
Google


Web
patrickweb.com



Disclosures

Aviation

daily  Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Rhinebeck Aerodrome


Airplane

Aviation has been a hobby for me since I first learned to fly in a Cessna 150 in 1970. Later earning a commercial ticket and an instrument rating made flying not only fun but practical. After moving away from the Philadelphia area to Connecticut in 1981, flying became less practical for a number of reasons and the Cessna 172 was sold. (See "I really prefer having an engine!"). In the last few years I have gotten a renewed interest in aviation.

An Indian Summer motorcycle ride up the Hudson to the Old Rhinebeck Aerodrome showed us a "living" museum of antique aviation. They have one of the largest collections of early aeroplanes in the world, many of which regularly take to the air in all their glory during weekend air shows. The Aerodrome features airplanes, cars, motorcycles, tractors and memorabilia from 1900-1935. The days of early aviation come to life with the roar of rotary engines and a World War I dogfight. The most amazing part of the day was watching world-renowned pilot, Stan Segalla, The Flying Farmer, performed things that seemed impossible. At the end of his Piper Cub feats he shut off the engine, did some fancy turns and landed in the center of the runway. Mr. Segalla is 82 years old.

There are many ways to follow what is going on in general aviation. America's 20,000 airports are a great place watch airplanes in action -- community airports are also a catalyst for economic growth. A good place to keep an eye on what is going on in general aviation is the AOPA. I attended their annual expo in Hartford, Connecticut last week and saw many exciting new aircraft and attended a seminar about the emerging very light jets. The VLJ's will surely have a major impact on the economics of air transportation. There are pictures from Rhinebeck and the AOPA Expo in the photo gallery.

Aviation October 9, 2007 09:46 PM

 

daily  Saturday, May 19, 2007

China 2007 - Epilogue


AirplaneVisiting China is an eye opener culturally and economically. It is a rapidly developing country and it appears that special interest groups do not get in the way of progress. Perhaps it was the same way when America was building the Hoover Dam or the Interstate Highway system. I was quite impressed with aviation in China. We took five flights within the country. Not sure how many airlines they have in total -- the Air Travel Guide for China lists seven. The ones we used all had new aircraft, they took off and landed on time, and the flight attendants were young, friendly and efficient. You had the feeling they really cared about your comfort. While U.S. airlines have eliminated pillows and blankets in economy seating, the Chinese airlines seemed to have an unlimited supply. Every flight, even if 45 minutes, had food. Check-in and security lines moved efficiently even though the airports and the number of people in them were huge. There are various claims made about airports but I don't think there is any debate that Beijing will soon be the largest -- and take just three years to complete.

In the U.S., we are very fortunate to have a transportation system that is highly reliable and gets us to where we want to go in an amazingly short time. The travel industry is a complex one and there is a huge legacy of process, management systems, and technology that makes it difficult to be as flexible and nimble as we all would like. The Chinese do not have all the legacy baggage -- no pun intended. Having offered that perspective, it is still at times incredible what we put up with.

The return flight from Beijing actually pulled away from the gate twenty minutes early, took off right on time, and landed at Newark Liberty International Airport exactly on schedule. After the plane sat on the tarmac for a few minutes, the captain announced that there would be a hold while they "waited for a gate assignment". The few minutes turned out to be ninety minutes. Someone knew for at least twelve hours when the flight would land yet there was no assigned place for it to go after landing. Apparently there was a mechanical problem with one of the planes that was occupying the space assigned to our plane. Since it was an international flight the plane needed to go to a certain terminal. Could we have been placed on a bus and be taken to that terminal? Newark is a very large airport and you would think there would be some way to park the plane and get the passengers to immigration. Could the problem have been an information problem? Could it be that that the flight arrival system and the gate scheduling system do not communicate?

Being a pilot myself, I feel confident in the men and women in the cockpit of an airline aircraft. Knowing a bit about the FAA regulations, I feel confident in the procedures for flying and safety inspections. When it comes to information oriented aspects of the airline industry I am much less confident. The lack of systems and applications integration becomes so painfully obvious. At times a plane gets to the gate on time but there is no one there to open the door. Another information breakdown? Perhaps the person was overworked and busy managing another flight but you certainly get the feeling that better information flow could make the airplane and people "flows" work better.

Japan Airlines has been using message queuing technology for more than ten years to enable their flight arrival system and their gate scheduling system to communicate. Message queuing technology can enable two (or more) incompatible systems to exchange messages so that things can be coordinated. Today's Service Oriented Architecture makes it much easier than ten years ago and it is very hard to justify having systems that don't communicate with each other (or a solid plan to get there).

I am sure many people could top the tarmac story from Newark but I doubt if anyone could top the Fire Truck incident though!

Epilogue to the epilogue: If you are interested in tracking flights, airplanes, or activities at airports, take a look at http://flightaware.com/

Aviation, IBM, Internet Technology, Travels May 19, 2007 09:29 AM

 

daily  Friday, December 1, 2006

Oslo via Stockholm


Jet airplaneThe best way to Oslo is a direct flight from Newark on one of Continental's new Boeing 767's but on this particular trip it was not available. The Scandinavian Airlines (SAS) Airbus 330 followed the instrument landing system approach into Stockholm early Tuesday morning with just 500 feet visibility and only a three-hundred foot ceiling. This is when all of us appreciate the ILS the most. Something I noticed that morning for the first time was that each gate at the airport had a sign showing the exact latitude and longitude of it's location. I have never noticed that anywhere else in the world and not sure how they use the information. Since all planes have GPS these days, perhaps it is a way to confirm to the crew that they are at the right gate.

The 9:00AM SAS Boeing 737 to Oslo took off at 9:00AM and landed in Oslo (the best airport in the world in my opinion) on time at 9:50am. The 10:06 Flytog (airport train) left the airport at 10:06. Timely trains and planes in Europe are just how they are. Seems like the U.S. should be able to do that also. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics tracks flight performance in great detail. For example, in September at JFK in New York, 23% of all flights were late. I am sure there are studies on why things run late in the U.S. I suspect it is a combination of labor rules, over commitment of routes, and poor integration of information systems. Some flights are actually early but then the plane sits on the tarmac waiting for a gate. This is now a decades old problem where the flight arrival system does not communicate with the gate scheduling system. When a plane leaves California for a 4+ hour flight to New York, it knows within a few minutes what time it will arrive but the systems can not communicate in order to accommodate an early arrival.

The good news is that the air safety record is superlative and, even though there is a lot to complain about, it is truly amazing what airlines can do. On the one hand, fifteen hours from home to the hotel in Oslo is a very long time, on the other hand it is quite amazing. Imagine what the vikings would think about getting from Norway to the U.S. in 8 hours! A visit to the Viking ship museum helps to understand what travel must have been like for them one thousand years ago.

Aviation December 1, 2006 03:29 AM