-

Medicare – Part 2

Posted by John Patrick on Jul 16, 2010 in Healthcare, Internet Technology

BooksHard for me to believe but I am about to go on Medicare! As I described in a rant about browser issues, the experience to date has been only with the administrative aspects– the clinical part does not start until next month. The entire enrollment was able to be completed online at medicare.gov — no faxes, no forms, no paper — and once I got the password issue resolved, I concluded that the mymedicare.gov web site is pretty good. Several improvements have been made to the site since I first learned about it a few months ago and it provides a broad range of information. I was particularly pleased to see that they are promoting e-prescribing. Appears like the site is comprehensive — seems it handles most aspects of life with Medicare. Most — but not all.

Today I received the first payment notice from Medicare — the coverage is not free. Medicare requested payment for the first three months. A second letter referred to a higher amount that I would pay and it referred to a third letter that would explain where the higher amount came from. Turns out it comes from an income adjusted premium. Health and Human Services gets data from the IRS and determines what the 2010 Medicare premium should be based on 2008 adjusted gross income. Just like airline seats there is a wide range of premiums that people pay toward their government provided healthcare. It is also clear that the differential premium between those who pay and those who don’t will grow. I’ll leave it to the politicians to debate that and use this posting to talk about the payment method.

The premium payment notice offered the choice of using a credit card or sending a check. The web site has no payment options and  credit card payments can not be done by phone. An option for automatic ACH payments is available but you have to call to set it up. The call results in an “order” being placed to have a “package of forms” sent out. After returning the forms the setup will take 6-8 weeks. In the meantime the monthly premium will need to be paid by check or credit card. I can not think of a reason that such old fashioned payment methods are all that are available. Security and complexity would appear simple compared to the billions of dollars that Amazon handles so smoothly with no checks and forms. Perhaps the priority is not high to automate the payment side of Medicare since most payments are handled as deductions from social security payments. This will not be the case until I start receiving social security payments a year from now when I turn 66.

One good thing that HHS is doing is chasing after fraud. Ninety-four medical professionals around the U.S. were charged yesterday for their alleged involvement in a scheme to submit $251 million of false claims to Medicare. If it is a choice between automating my monthly payment versus deploying technology to eliminate or at least drastically reduce fraud I will clearly vote for the latter. IBM has been assisting in fraud detection for a long time (See  Fraud Reduction Could Fund A Chunk Of Healthcare). If ever there was a strong need for analytics it would be in fraud detection. By looking at patterns of provider applications, payment requests, repeat visits, diagnosis versus treatments, etc. it is possible to discern likely fraud. Billions of dollars have been recovered so far and unfortunately there are many more billions to go after. The amount of data is huge but the power of supercomputers and advanced analytics software is even more awesome. With thirty million more people coming into the healthcare system the number of transactions and potential for abuse will increase dramatically. The bad news is the likely increase in criminals targeting Medicare but the good news is that the tools are getting better and better and it appears that HHS is giving a high priority to applying the tools to the task at hand.

IBM is making large bets in healthcare beyond just fraud detection. Yesterday the company announced a three year Research investment to help medical practitioners and insurance companies provide high-quality, evidence-based care to patients and reduce costs.  As part of this initiative, IBM is hiring medical doctors to work alongside its researchers to develop new technologies, scientific advancements, and business processes for healthcare and insurance providers.
Related links
bullet Other healthcare related stories on patrickWeb

Tags: , , ,

 
-

Fraud Reduction Could Fund A Chunk Of Healthcare

Posted by John Patrick on Jan 29, 2006 in Healthcare, IBM

DoctorsOn February7 we will be discussing Computational Biology at Demo. No doubt we will hear about some potential breakthroughs in healthcare. One thing we know for sure is that new healthcare solutions are costly. How will people afford them? There are many issues associated with this and one of them is the fraud that occurs in today’s system. IBM has been working on this area for years and recently introduced their solution in Rockland County, New York.

The IBM Verify New York Medicaid claims management program has identified $13M in potentially improper Medicaid billing in just 10% of the cases in just one county in just one state. For a modest software and consulting fee, IBM used it’s powerful supercomputers to do a sophisticated statistical analysis of the billing from the top 10% of Medicaid reimbursed pharmacies and general practice doctors in the county during a 21-month period. Seems like a good target since New York’s Medicaid program is the largest in the US, with an annual cost of $44.5 billion — and rising fast.

Rockland County has more than 41,000 residents who use Medicaid and the county spends about $384 million a year on their care. Initial estimates are that as much as $13 million of the billing may be improper. If this turns out to be the case, the nationwide numbers are in the $billions for sure. The IBM system uses thousands of queries to look for anomalies such as suspiciously large numbers of bills for services on a single day, repetitive or duplicate billing or unusually expensive services. Forty-two percent of the ten percent in Rockland County appeared to have discrepancies.

The project doesn’t mean that providers are automatically guilty nor that the money can be quickly recovered but at least it shows the investigators where to look. They have always had the data but with help from IBM they now have the tools. There are obstacles. In New York, the counties are responsible for Medicare but they are not allowed to take action against fraud. Only the state can do that — but they haven’t. The IBM program enables the counties to provide very specific information to the state and press for action to reduce fraud.
Related links
bullet Other patrickWeb healthcare related stories

Tags: , , , , ,

 
-

Phishing – Part 2

Posted by John Patrick on Dec 16, 2003 in PKI

Man in fishing boatA number of readers were surprised to learn about phishing, and more than one suggested that I send the example to eBay. Actually, I am quite confident that eBay is on top of this issue. I suspect they scan continuously to find eBay fraud of all kinds — including phishing emails. eBay is an incredibly large and successful community for buyers and sellers and they have thought through all the aspects of the buying and selling processes. Any inhibitor to the growth of the community is something they are responsive too. Unfortunately, it is a constant battle to stay ahead of the fraudsters. Bob Safier shared with me an amazing fraudulent email that he received. (read more)

Tags: , , ,

 
-

Phishing

Posted by John Patrick on Dec 14, 2003 in PKI

Man in fishing boatIn the Inside ID Conference report (part 4) I mentioned "phishing" as one of the types of fraudulent activity that is happening on the Internet. Today I received an example personally. This is such a blatant example of fraud I hope and suspect that the Federal Trade Commission is taking swift action. I also hope sharing this here will make more people aware of this kind of sham, and I urge all to let their friends and families know. According to people at the conference I just attended, the positive response rate — people who actually provide their personal information to the phishers — is 30%. That is extraordinarily high compared to spam or legitimate advertising. (read more)

Tags: , , , ,